Layout Image

30 Year Cover-Up of Vaccine Dangers Exposed in UK Government Transcripts

vaccines-dirty-secretsAn extraordinary paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.

A Freedom of Information Act filing by a doctor in the UK, has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have

1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies

Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US, and many other countries.

No pharmaceutical drug is devoid of risks from adverse reactions and vaccines are no exception. According to the world’s leading drug regulatory authority, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), vaccines represent a special category of drugs in that they are generally given to healthy individuals and often to prevent a disease to which an individual may never be exposed. This, according to the FDA, places extra emphasis on vaccine safety.

Universally, regulatory authorities are responsible for ensuring that new vaccines go through proper scientific evaluation before they are approved. An equal responsibility rests on the medical profession to promote vaccinations but only with those vaccines whose safety and efficacy has been demonstrated to be statistically significant. Furthermore, vaccination is a medical intervention and as such, it should be carried out with the full consent of those who are being subjected to it. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known or foreseeable risks and benefits and, where applicable, a description of alternative courses of treatment. In cases where children and infants are involved, full consent
with regards to vaccination should be given by the parents.

Deliberately concealing information from the parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could thus be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.

Vaccine-Results-LiesAs a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki Declaration and the International Code of Medical Ethics) but also, their own Code of Practice.

This is what everyone has always known but could never prove before now. Pass this information on to others so they can see what goes on in Government health committees behind locked doors.

The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such
controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and disturbing
lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release under the FOI section at the JCVI website (for example, JCVI CSM/DH (Committee on the Safety of Medicines/Department of Health) Joint Committee on Adverse Reactions Minutes 1986-1992.

In summary, the transcripts of the JCVI/DH meetings from the period from 1983 to 2010 appear to show that:

1) Instead of reacting appropriately by re-examining existing vaccination policies when safety concerns over specific vaccines were identified by their own investigations, the JCVI either a) took no action, b) skewed or selectively removed unfavourable safety data from public reports and c) made intensive efforts to reassure both the public and the authorities in the safety of respective vaccines;

2) Significantly restricted contraindication to vaccination criteria in order to increase vaccination rates despite outstanding and unresolved safety issues;

3) On multiple occasions requested from vaccine manufacturers to make specific amendments to their data sheets, when these were in conflict  with JCVI’s official advices on immunisations;

4) Persistently relied on methodologically dubious studies, while dismissing independent research, to promote vaccine policies;

5) Persistently and categorically downplayed safety concerns while over-inflating vaccine benefits;

6) Promoted and elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of questionable efficacy and safety into the routine paediatric schedule, on the assumption that the licenses would eventually be granted;

7) Actively discouraged research on vaccine safety issues;

8) Deliberately took advantage of parents’ trust and lack of relevant knowledge on vaccinations in order to promote a scientifically unsupported immunisation program which could put certain children at risk of severe long-term neurological damage.

Dr. Tomlijenovic explains; for instance, how JCVI has known since as early as 1981 that the measles vaccine, which is part of the government’s official vaccine schedule, is linked to long-term neurological damage and death. She also outlines, with full citations, evidence showing that JCVI has long been aware that many of scheduled vaccines cause permanent brain damage in children, but have continued to promote those vaccines anyway.

 

vaccines_sommee-cardsEducated parents can either get their children out of harm’s way or continue living inside one of the largest most evil lies in history, that vaccines – full of heavy metals, viral diseases, mycoplasma, fecal material, DNA fragments from other species, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (a sterilizing agent) – are a miracle of modern medicine.

A Freedom of Information Act filing in the US with the CDC by a doctor with an autistic son, seeking information on what the CDC knows about the dangers of vaccines, had by law to be responded to in 20 days. Nearly 7 years later, the doctor went to court and the CDC argued it does not have to turn over documents. A judge ordered the CDC to turn over the documents on September 30th, 2011.

The US CDC is an unreliable source of information. They constantly grossly exaggerate death and disease figures to promote vaccines. The UK Department of Health does the same. Both for example have claimed flu causes thousands of deaths each year but in fact it does not. They do that to promote the flu vaccine, which the international Cochrane Collaboration, which publishes medical research into the accuracy of claims like that, has shown that the flu vaccine is not effective.

On October 26, 2011, a Denver Post editorial expressed shock that the Obama administration, after promising to be especially transparent, was proposing changes to the Freedom of Information Act that would allow it to go beyond declaring some documents secret and to actually allow government agencies (such as the CDC) to declare some document “non-existent.”

 

VacIngredientsA short summary of the most important arguments that support NON-VACCINATION:

  • Vaccines contain a combination of at least 39 different highly toxic metals, cancer causing substances, toxic chemicals, live and genetically modified viruses, bacteria, contaminated serum containing animal viruses and foreign genetic material, extremely toxic de-contaminants and adjuvants, untested antibiotics, none of which can be injected without causing any harm. Vaccine contaminants have included bovine (cow), avian (chicken) and monkey viruses and bacteria such as streptococcus in the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) vaccine [Pediatrics, Vol. 75, No. 2, Feb 1985] and Serratia marcesens in the influenza vaccines [2004 influenza season].
  • There is no scientific study to determine whether vaccines have really prevented diseases. Rather disease graphs show vaccines have been introduced at the end of epidemics when the disease was already in its last stages. In case of Small Pox the vaccine actually caused a great spurt in the incidence of disease before public outcry led to its withdrawal.
  • There are no long-term studies on vaccine safety. Very short-term tests are carried out where the vaccinated subjects are checked against another group who are given another vaccine. Technically the tests should be carried out against a non-vaccinated group. No one really knows what protocols are followed at such industry based or industry sponsored trials.
  • The mercury, aluminum and live viruses in vaccines may be behind the huge epidemic of autism (1 in 110 in the USA), a fact that has been admitted by the US Vaccine Court. About 83 suspected cases of vaccines causing autism have been awarded compensation.
  • Both the Small Pox and the Oral Polio Vaccine are made from monkey serum. This serum has helped many monkey viruses to enter the human blood stream. Out of these, the only researched virus, SV 40, has been found to be cancerous. These viruses continue to be in the vaccines. The presence of SV 40 in various human cancers has been demonstrated. Today it is known that the virus is being passed on to future generations as its presence in the mother’s milk and human sperms has been established.
  • The number of polio cases was declining before the widespread administration of the Salk vaccine.  Cases which had previously been reported as polio are now reported as meningitis. The risk of contracting polio from the live virus vaccine is greater than the risk of acquiring the disease from naturally occurring viruses.
  • Many doctors argue that diseases during childhood are due to the body exercising its immune system. Suppressing these diseases causes the immune system to remain undeveloped causing the various autoimmune disorders in adults like diabetes and arthritis that have become epidemics today.
  • Vaccines suppress the natural immunity and the body does not have natural antibodies anymore. The mother’s milk therefore does not contain natural antibodies and can no longer protect the child against illnesses.
  • In the USA vaccine adverse effects are recorded and the Government offers compensation of millions of dollars to victims (the most recent case in its Vaccine Court may have received upto $200 million in damages). The courts in the USA have paid nearly $ 2 billion in damages so far.
  • Vaccines try to create humoral (blood related immunity) whereas it has been found that immunity is developed at various levels: humoral, cellular, and organ specific. We still do not know enough about the human immune system and therefore should not interfere with it.
  • In addition to childhood vaccination, new “hypes” like the Swine Flu, Bird Flu, Gardasil for HPV virus and the annual flu vaccine are continuing the to damage people’s health all throughout their life. Yves Thomas, the head of the National Influenza Centre in Geneva said that, “The debate and the arguments that surrounded the A(H1N1) influenza virus two years ago have sharpened public mistrust toward the seasonal flu vaccine.” In 2010, the World Health Organisation (WHO) was accused of dramatizing worldwide influenza cases in order to result in much higher vaccine sales since many countries had signed contracts with a stipulation to automatically buy vaccines when the WHO gave the highest alert level.

A Few Questions To Ask Your Doctor

vaccine-cartoonDon’t let yourself intimidated by medical doctors, they are NOT Gods and they surely are misinformed, many of them are corrupted or don’t want to acknowledge the dangers of vaccines. Most schools will offer you a waiver if you ask for one. There is NO law that can deny you that. Exemptions are typically for people who have compromised immune systems, allergies to the components used in vaccinations, or strongly held objections. All states but West Virginia and Mississippi allow religious exemptions, and twenty states allow parents to cite personal or philosophical objections. Get yourself educated on the matter, it’s about the life of your child!

ASK QUESTIONS like these:

1. What are the serious negative health effects that these vaccines can generate? Are the risks worth the benefits?

2. Dr. Michel Odent has linked asthma to the whooping cough vaccine. Have you read his research? What do you think?

3. Professor Wakefield (UK) has linked autism and Chrones disease to the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. What do you think? What evidence do you have to back up your opinions?

4. Why is the same dose of vaccines given to a two month old as for a 5 year old?

5. Are you aware that Japan changed the start time for vaccinating from 3 months to two years and straight away their SIDS rate plummeted?

6. Do you believe in herd immunity? If so, how is it that 98% of U.S.A. children are vaccinated yet they still have outbreaks of these diseases?

7. Most diseases were already 90% gone before any vaccines were introduced.  If this is so, how can vaccines be applauded for diseases ceasing, especially when there were no vaccines for some diseases like bubonic plague and scarlet fever?

8. How can the Tetanus vaccine induce immunity, when contracting the disease naturally does not give immunity?

9. If the so-called diphtheria vaccine, which is in fact a toxoid, works against the toxin produced by the bacteria, and not against the bacteria itself, then how did this “vaccine” help in the decline in diphtheria?

To read and download the full 45 page report and its evidence by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD see the link below.

Read & Download Full Report.

Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination

Source (1), (2), (3), (4)

Related Posts:

 

 

Please Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Plus
  • Delicious
  • Email

Comments

  1. Interesting article, and I’m not pro-vaccine, but a lot of my friends are, and they really like to see citations with research articles, especially ones they don’t agree with. Do you have links the the studies mentioned?

  2. So if the JCVI/DH have violated theInternational Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki Declaration and the International Code of Medical Ethics) but also, their own Code of Practice, what can be done and how can we go about suing these arseholes for the kids that have already been vaccinated?

    30 years is a lot of kids who have been poptentially damaged. I know some parents wont care or not believe this but what about for those who found out this stuff too late? Can we go about suing the NHS and the government? A collective lawsuit? It wont undo the harm but may force them to acknowledge…..

  3. Hi, thanku for ur research, I was born on 75 and I was given some of the vaccines, but not all. I must say tho, I was caught by when I was 25 over the UK and was pounced upon and utterly fooled and lied by a so called Dr, named Sonia Johnson, the cunting cunt, and was put on pills which are running, and ruining, my life. I tried twice giving them up, first time I was lied again this time by my psychologist, the man I most relied on and trusted, so they put me back on them when acacia ocurred under my deep ignorance. Having later been informed of the truth by the reading of toxic psychiatry, I took over the task of reducing the amisulpride slowly over two years. In the end the reaction was too abominable to describe here, and v difficult and painful elsewhere, but I ended up in a bizarre matrix world full of alucinations and ended up succumbing to a heart attack by noon in the middle of the high st. I managed by my humanity and the mercy of the Lord, and this is a fact, to survive, but I had to double the dosage of the crap. Of course, I’ve been complaining to them openly and earnestly over the past ten years, but all of them doctors have insisted in me taking the shit. They threaten relapse, but this is a Lie. It is the addiction to them what causes the immense body response, otherwise only a remote fraction of the current disruption. I have no idea what I’m taking, everyday, at 8 pm, for the rest of my life. The philosophical and health implications of these are atrocious. This is the life I’ve been forced unto.
    You all are next.

  4. Pharmaceutical companies are the enemy, they promote drug dependency at the cost of the natural remedies that are all our bodies need.

    This article is awesome.

    Questions 6 and 9 are particularly important

  5. Oh, please get some more information before settling on the conclusions from this article. I’m expecting my first daughter, and these questions are extremely important to me.

    But, most of the plagues that made infant death rates drop from extremely high rates at my granddads time (he lost half of his siblings) to very low rates for my father (no deaths on my fathers generation in the same family), are directly contributed to the introduction of penicillin and vaccines. We really don’t want to go back.

    What these articles are insinuating, is that a a hugh amount of people are willing to let baby’s die for the profit of medical companies, or simply for political gains. If you really think the world is that sinister, I think we all have a problem. Infant mortality has gone down at an amazing rate since the introduction of modern medicine. Please don’t fold into conspiracy theories that will ruin this work. TB is coming back in the UK because of parents suspicions that the medical industry would actually like to harm their children to make a quick buck… It really doesn’t make any sense.

    I do read medical articles about subjects like this, but I can’t find any references to sources in this one. Why should I trust it???

    • you’ll find most information you can want at this link:

      http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/

      We too have been long anti-vaccine parents and now have a 10 month baby and the letters keep coming through the post to remind us it’s time to vaccinate! You can however defer until you have enough evidence to support your decision on either course of action. Never let your self be bullied either way on this matter! all the best.

    • I agree, more citations would be fantastic. It’s a big decision to make. As a Mother of 4 (now 22, 19, 15 and 10 yrs old) who chose not to vaccinate any of my children for anything, I offer my experience in the hope that you find it helps. None of my children had infections needing antibiotics. They variously had measles, chicken pox, and two had whooping cough. None of it was particularly bad, a week or two with some fevers and reactions, and good home nursing (lots of Vitamin C) and they emerged perfectly well. I have read significant research showing improved immunity from (particularly) measles, and did notice a maturing in my daughters intellectually after the measles. Notably, their friends who have similar lifestyles but were vaccinated for whooping cough had a terrible time of it, needing hospitalisation. Ultimately the choice should remain with the parents, and we all make decisions hoping them to be the best for our children. I’m an educated parent, and the information I have accessed left me in no doubt. My children are healthy, thriving young adults now and they are grateful. (Two of my friends also have vaccine damaged children, one who will never walk and the other has severe multiple allergies). They live with the pain.

    • dear BR to attemp to answer some of your questions i asked a good friend of mine who is an health practioner for some answers ….the plagues of old had mainly exhausted themselves when vaccination were introduced …infant mortallity rates were significantly reduced by rigid hygiene practices began by a german doctor in the late 50 s and later adopted by all european countries …i dont know much about the tb issue but it is possible that through continued vaccinations it is kept alive in the population …you and your baby’s best health best wishes catherine

  6. Doesn’t surprise me one bit. It’s a shame we can’t trust the pharmaceutical industry, but it’s clear we can’t. Samuel Hahmenamann, the founder of homeopathy, said that people were worse off going to a doctor than had they never bothered. Not much has changed since his times in that respect. I had to visit the doctor because at the time I had no choice, and I ended up worse for it.

    • Homeopathy is a hoax. The idea that remedies get stronger when diluted is just plain stupidity. I do however believe in the placebo effect, and that it is better than medicine, if you can be fooled. But quoting a homeopathy practitioner in matters of science, is ridiculous. Any claims of effect beyond placebo (which is by no means exclusive to homeopathy), has been thoroughly proven false.

      • What do you believe the body is? Is the body makeup not a matter of science? Is our understanding of how the body heals itself not a matter of science?
        Is science not the proof of a theory either by witnessing the result of a specific test or empirical evidence?

      • Allopathic medicine is the real hoax, however the Medical Association has done a great job at convincing the human race otherwise.

        Would you cure a disease by introducing toxins into the body that destroys cells and weaken the immune system (allopathic), or introducing nutrients into the body that cleanses cells and strengthens the immune system (homeopathic)?

    • Yeah same here, it became worse for me too.. anyway, this is what people need to understand and know about…our human body is made up of cells.. our body is healthy if our cells are healthy. Our body becomes sick if our cells are sick.. so what we need to keep our body healthy is to keep our cells healthy. So the question is, what makes the cells of our body healthy? When people try to research this,it’s all about nutrition and not medication.. since nutrition, nurtures, nourishes,supports cellular functions and strengthens our cells..in pharmacology, it has been taught that all drugs and vaccines are toxic and have side effects..from the word toxic, how is that related to making our cells healthy? Right? Besides not all statistics are true,most especially the mortality rate, they speak of huge amount of people dying then reduced because of their vaccines and medications.. but the question is, where are those being mentioned dead buried then? Can you imagine the amount of dead people dying..that much dead bodies should have piled up already.. also, in this world, there is what we call economy.. the medical field itself is part of economy. It needs to earn money too, to keep things running and operational.. but where does the money come from? It’s from sick people.. people go to doctors or undergo procedures and treatments when they get sick,when that happens,people carry with them their money, but only if people get sick.. now the marketing strategy of the medical field is.. Illness promotion, promotes health services.. that is why they give you drugs because of it’s side effects or complications..you are not being medicated, but drugged.. an intervention with complication will complicate your situation and your budget as well.. for every complication, it requires another intervention.. every intervention, is not for free.. look at people around you, a lot are suffering from their illnesses for too long already, you think they are suffering because they have done nothing.. they are taking medications already.. but why still suffer? Because clearly what you think is cure, is not really a cure.. You cant call something as a cure if it’s not acting like one. Remember, action speaks louder than words because only action would show results and the results is what matters. The end justify the means. Whatever good words or means the doctor tells you,if the results tells you or if you still feel that your body is still suffering, it only means one thing.. the means is not a cure but simply just drugs.. listen to what your body is telling you, it’s more honest than your doctors.. if it is still sick despite the fact that you followed the doctor’s order already,then that proves it.. or try looking at others..learn from other people’s mistake most especially if you have the same illness from them.. look at them and what meds are they taking? Are they cured from it? Or are they still suffering and even suffering more because of the complications.. because if you are also gonna do the same thing as what they are doing, your gonna end up just like them…

  7. Where are the citations????Where indeed….They dont exist…I have only a basic knowledge of pharmacology but I can tell you that Ive never read such a load of rubbish…..Do some REAL research and you will get the truth – just ask any 90 year old about how many people died in their childhood from now-vaccinated diseases and think about how many you know who are rolling around poisoned by vaccines…ITS A NO-BRAINER!!!Do NOT stop vaccinating your kids….

    • Keep taking your medication. The pharmaceutical companies love you and care deeply about your well-being. While you’re at it, smoke some Camels, they’re recommended by doctors after all.

      • In fact, most doctors in every state prefer Camels over any other cigarette.
        How long will we as a people allow this hamster wheel to continue. It must be the fluoridation. Hitler really did know what he was doing.

  8. Oh and homeopathy has been debunked so many times I don’t know how people don’t know….If it worked for you then fine but its likely to be a placebo effect and dont rely on it to keep your kids safe…Wake up people !!!!

    • Can you cite these studies you refer to? I know many studies that show Homeopathy working. As for placebo, isn’t that what the vast majority of medicine is based on?

      I read a scientific paper this week, referred to people who got mumps- 97% had already been vaccinated.

      You know what they said in the conclusion- males who had been vaccinated were less likely to have inflamed bollocks as a result of the mumps. Can you imagine the pressure on those authors to come up with that?

  9. Andrew Wakefield cited above as having linked autism, Crohns etc

    “Professor Wakefield (UK) has linked autism and Chrones disease to the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine.”

    is not a professor, has had his medical license revoked, and has had his “research” rejected for being effectively fraudulent. If you want a conspiracy there is one. Wakefield was retained by a law firm (hoping to make money out of a class action) to provide evidence. Surprise, surprise! He did what he was paid to do.

    • Like any doctor today, when you decide to go against the grain of the medical system, you are forfeiting your career and credibility. Any and every medical professional should be scared to attempt to discredit the benefits of medications and promote natural healing.

  10. I don’t believe anything I read on websites unless they’re cited by credible sources. This website seems to be tabloid and conspiracy. Show me medical articles with statistics from REAL doctors. Until experts confirm this, I won’t believe this.

    • What do you believe qualifies as a real doctor today?
      How about one with a medical degree who was taught in medical schools and read from medical literature developed and published by people in organizations whose best interests rely on keeping people sick to make money.
      Does a real doctor know how to do anything other than prescribe medication today?
      Do you think a real doctor is willing to throw away his or her license or potentially worse by prescribing something other than medication to a patient?
      Do you think a real doctor would still have a job if he or she attempted to prove that vaccinations were indeed harmful (as we have seen happen in the past)?

  11. Through the use of vaccinations, the eugenics program continues worldwide and making revenue from them in the meanwhile.

  12. Here’s a link the paper some people have asked for.

    http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf

    The concept that the people in positions of service to the planet do not have our best intentions at heart is hard to take. Im sure the majority are blindly following training and feel they dont need to ask important questions themselves. Or perhaps afraid of loosing face, worse case scenario, their mortage payments. Brave person indeed.

    Who would be so naughty to poison people? Theres no motive? Crazy talk! Well, the people of the world are putting the dots together and something has been played across the board. Anyone who independently researches into so called conspiracy theories( there does seem to be a knee jerk reaction to C/theories) have more questions than answers …Try not to except everything we are told and find the truth yourself..Peace

  13. Hi there moderators. Why didnt my comment/answer to requests for transcipt links not get authorized.
    I wasnt rude or off topic. Never replyed to any board of any klind on the internet, thought iwas being helful…Peace

Leave a Reply